[WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [CS Bureau] Review of CSB bureau

[CONGO - Philippe Dam]

Robert, 

 

The two paragraphs I sent earlier today were the views expressed by members
of the WSIS CSB during a lunchtime discussion – rather than during a
consultation. Those discussing this issue have not asserted they were
speaking _on behalf of_ the CSB. By memory, I think that Francis Muguet,
Ann-Kristin Hakansson, Tijani Ben Jemaa and Djilali Benamrane were present
during this lunchtime discussion. I was also there but I am not a CSB member
as you know. 

 

And there is not at this time any negotiation process. The discussion we had
today was actually encouraged by the recent significant comments brought on
this list, considering it was relevant to use this space for dialogue among
those present in Paris. 

 

To clarify in particular the second paragraph, sent earlier this evening, it
goes without saying, in my understanding of the discussion, that final
decision supporting the adaptation of the CSB or of any CSB-like structure
in the following steps, expectedly in May 2007, should be taken by a CS
Plenary. In such a reflection process, members of the WSIS CSB will
therefore have a particular role in stimulating a discussion on this issue
and to involve all other CS actors interested. 

 

Best, 

 

Philippe

 

 

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] De la part
de Robert Guerra
Envoyé : mardi 17 octobre 2006 19:19
À : bureau at wsis-cs.org
Cc : plenary at wsis-cs.org; philippe.dam at ngocongo.org
Objet : [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [CS Bureau] Review of CSB bureau

 

[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list.
Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]

 

Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of
this message!

_______________________________________

 

Philippe:

 

please do specify which members of the CSB were in fact consulted. I am

on the CSB, and have received no communications on the matter.

 

Again, the issue of transparency is an important one - please do provide

details as to who is speaking on behalf of the CSB and what they are

negotiating.

 

regards

 

Robert

 

WSIS wrote:

> Dear all,

> 

>  

> 

> Some members of the Civil Society Bureau to the World Summit on the

> Information Society have informally discussed during lunchtime today, on

> the occasion of the UNESCO lead Action Line Facilitation meetings taking

> place in Paris. Since the question of civil society self-organising

> mechanisms in the up coming WSIS implementation and follow-up processes

> has been raised on this list, the general agreement among those

> participating in the discussion was that CSB members who are still

> committed and active in the process should continue to deal with

> immediate support to CS inclusion in the up coming events, to fill the

> existing needs and emerging expectations express! ed by CS entities,

> Governments and intergovernmental partners.

> 

>  

> 

> The question of the adaptation of the CSB or of any CSB-like structure

> in the following steps should be agreed by May 2007 at the occasion of

> the expectedly wide CS gathering during the up coming cluster of WSIS

> implementation and follow-up events. The discussion on the *future

> composition*, and even most importantly on the *role* of this structure,

> should be carried on by the WSIS CSB members from now until May 2007, in

> an inclusive manner with other CS entities involved in the process.

> 

>  

> 

> We surely can go in this direction asap. This issue was also discussed

> among a wider group of CS representatives at the end of the day.

> 

>  

> 

> Best regards,

> 

>  

> 

> Philippe Dam 

> 

 

_______________________________________________

Plenary mailing list

Plenary at wsis-cs.org

http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20061018/e4729fe3/attachment.htm