[WSIS CS-Plenary] Submitting comments/documents - Procedural
comment...
T N Anuradha
t.n.anuradha at oneworld.net
Fri Sep 2 11:26:38 BST 2005
Even Grassroots Caucus Recommendation to the GFC report doesnot appear
on the site, though it was sent to wsis-contributions at itu.int
Anuradha
-----Original Message-----
From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On
Behalf Of Ralf Bendrath
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 3:48 PM
To: plenary at wsis-cs.org
Subject: Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Submitting comments/documents -
Procedural comment...
[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for
specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
_______________________________________
Robert Guerra wrote:
> Another document that also hasn't been posted at all, anywhere, is the
> bureau-2-bureau document formulated at PrepCom 2 (Tunis phase).
I have posted it a while ago at
<http://www.worldsummit2003.de/download_en/CSB-Summit_and_beyond_modalit
ies_final.rtf>
> Despite
> assurances that it would be posted by the WSIS ES, i do not think any
> NGO that forms part of the CSB officially submitted it.
It even took me a few emails to get the final version from the CS bureau
members.
> 2. As the privacy and security working group is not "an accredited
> entity" , but instead a "grouping of accredited entities" - it SHOULD
> ALSO submit it's proposal to the wsis ES (email address above) . How
can
> it do so? Well, one or more of the members of the Working group submit
> the document "on behalf of" the working group. It's that easy
You can also just submit it on behalf of the CS Privacy and Security
Working Group. That's what I did with the Comments on the WGIG report.
They were online the next day, see
<http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/listing.asp?lang=en&c_event=wg|ig&c_t
ype=co|>,
the very last entry.
> In summary : I can't stress how important it is to follow the
> procedure
> that has been established.
And use the right emails. I first sent the above mentioned comment to
<wgig at unog.ch> and only the next day realized it should have gone to
<wsis-contributions at itu.int>. But they still accepted it, though the
official deadline was already over.
I general, the ITU/WSIS website people are very helpful and responsive.
You just have to send them the stuff.
Best, Ralf
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
More information about the Plenary
mailing list