[WSIS CS-Plenary] CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents

[Rik Panganiban]

Jean Louis, et al,

Whether we like it or not, the private sector are also "stakeholders" 
in the WSIS.  I think it's good for us to know what they are up to, 
just as good strategy.  Similarly, if there is a new EU or African 
government initiative, I would expect us to share that information on 
the CS plenary list, since it affects us all.

Respectfully,

Rik Panganiban
CONGO

On May 25, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK wrote:

> Sorry Karen
>
> The WSIS CS website isn't an advertising place for CCBI announcements. 
> They have their own space and all the contributions are on the 
> official ITU WSIS website.
>
> So, please let them know that.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jean-Louis Fullsack
>
> CSDPT-France
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>> > Message du 25/05/05 11:30
>> > De : "karen banks"
>> > A : plenary at wsis-cs.org
>> > Copie à :
>> > Objet : [WSIS CS-Plenary] CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters 
>> One and Four of Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents
>> >
>> > dear all,
>> >
>> > passing this on at Ayesha Hassan's request.
>> >
>> > regards
>> > karen
>> >
>> > >Subject: CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of
>> > >Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents
>> > >Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:25:46 +0200
>> > >From: "HASSAN Ayesha"
>> > >To: "HASSAN Ayesha" ,
>> > > Wolfgang Kleinwächter
>> > > ,
>> > > , ,
>> > > ,
>> > >Cc: "ZANNI May"
>> > >
>> > >Dear Wolfgang, Bertrand, Renate and Karen,
>> > >
>> > >A mistake was found and corrected in the text of the previous 
>> version of
>> > >the CCBI input that I sent to you on 19 May.
>> > >
>> > >My apologies for any inconvenience this has caused.
>> > >
>> > >Specifically, on page 3 the comment read:
>> > >
>> > > E. CCBI supports [new 6k1,6k2 and 6k3], submitted by the ILO, 
>> OECD, and
>> > > UNCTAD and proposes text for new 6k3 .> > 
>> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
>> > >
>> > >And the cut and paste of the full ILO, OECD, UNCTAD comments which
>> > >included a proposed new [new 6k4.] k4. was not deleted in the 
>> drafting process.
>> > >
>> > >This has been fully re-circulated and resubmitted to the WSIS-ES 
>> etc.
>> > >
>> > >I would appreciate it if you could circulate the corrected text to 
>> anyone
>> > >that you sent the previous version to.
>> > >
>> > >Thank you for your anticipated understanding.
>> > >
>> > >Best regards,
>> > >Ayesha
>> > >
>> > [ FINAL FINAL CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of Operational 
>> Part of WSIS-Tunis documents.pdf (106.0 Ko) ]
>> > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.0 Ko) ]