[WSIS CS-Plenary] WIPO denies ad hoc NGO observor statusfor
April Development Agenda meeting
Federico Heinz
fheinz at vialibre.org.ar
Mon Feb 21 03:39:32 GMT 2005
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 05:50 -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
> [...]We have had a debate/dialogue here about the role of IPR issues
> in the WGIG and some have contended that the whole thing should be
> left to the WIPO forum. They have, I think, failed to understand the
> helpful and complementary effect that coordination across WSIS/WGIG,
> WIPO, and other forums could have.
When did that happen? I haven't seen anybody here say that patents,
copyrights, trademarks or anything else should be "left to the WIPO
forum". I (and others) have said that these issues are not relevant to
internet governance, and thus do not belong into WGIG's scope. Saying
that WGIG is the wrong forum is not the same as saying that WIPO is the
only right one. Very far from it.
Fede
--
GnuPG Public Key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-key BD02C6E0
Key Fingerprint: 04F4 08C5 14B7 2C3D DB21 ACF8 6CF5 0B0C BD02 C6E0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/plenary/attachments/20050221/9361a805/attachment.pgp
More information about the Plenary
mailing list