[WSIS CS-Plenary] IMPORTANT - [ Latest operpass compilation...]

[Meryem Marzouki]

Hi Robert, Al, and all,

Robert, thank you for your work in compiling a list. Unfortunately, 
your list doesn't take into account  the last information (although 
provided to you for information).

Your list doesn't take into account the coordination efforts we made 
between at least the human rights caucus and the privacy and security 
working group, although you are aware of this.

Please all don't add to the confusion.

I'm thus asking that this list be disregarded. As Al said, the more 
reliable information is the one provided by each caucus, working group 
or "family" coordinator.
These list should be send directly to the secretariat by each entity 
coordinator, with a copy to the plenary.
When room remains, the secretariat should satisfy the additional 
requests.

Meryem

Le jeudi, 4 déc 2003, à 06:35 Europe/Paris, Alan G. Alegre a écrit :

> Its appreciated, Rober t:-)t. Someone has to do it eventually and it 
> appears
> that it is now you! Thanks... :-)
> (I continue to believe that is is the Secretariat's job, but maybe 
> they are
> busy with a million other things :-)
>
> But my letter was precisely preventing any misunderstanding how this is
> being handled, because of the lack of information and the lack of 
> validation
> of the system being proposed several times.
>
> If you really want to take the lead in this, Robert (or anyone else) 
> please
> just lead in the discussion take in all the comments (there are few) to
> suggest revisions to Sean's proposal, and then ask for endorsements.
> (Similar to the Fellowships letter recently). And ask those who do not
> endorse to clearly state their reasons and TO SUGGEST REVISIONS AND
> ALTERNATIVES so we may move forward on this.
>
> Even as the limits of online consultations like this becomes evident 
> to all
> :-), it is still the primary mode collective decision making which has 
> the
> most chance of transparency and accountability--as an alternative to
> unilateral and notransparent decision making by a few which we are 
> trying to
> avoid.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Guerra <rguerra at cpsr.org>
> To: <plenary at wsis-cs.org>
> Cc: <bureau at wsis-cs.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Latest operpass compilation...
>
>
>> Alan:
>>
>>
>> I agree with you, particularly on the concept of those who have worked
>> on WSIS in the past (both at the meetings themselves, and virtually
>> online) should have priority.
>>
>> Someone needed to take the initiative, to try to bring an order to
>> number lists people seem to be sending here, there and everywhere. I
>> have volunteered to compile the lists, in a hope to bring some order 
>> and
>> make it easier for us all to have an idea, a rough estimate as to how
>> many people we are talking about.
>>
>> How the list gets used, and who ends up getting the overpasses is
>> something I do not what to do...that i'll leave to the rest, the 
>> plenary
>> to decide.
>>
>> I would like to think that a centralized listing is better than tens 
>> of
>> different lists...
>>
>> just trying to help
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Robert
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plenary mailing list
>> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>